The Facebook Punch: First Casualty Twitter!


Couple of months back I wrote a blog post called “The Future of War: A Digital Doomsday” where I mention that future wars would be fought in the clouds and giant corporations would try to eat each other, in the process only one of them emerging the clear winner. It already looks like Facebook has laid out the framework for its next assault and the first major casualty would be Twitter, followed by Google. One would be mistaken to think it is better technology that is driving Facebook but the fact is, the roots of the future success of Facebook lie in the very nature of human behavior.

I will speak in great detail about that in my next post but in this post I would like to specifically talk of how Twitter is on its path to annihilation because of Facebook, and why it is very important for Facebook to do what Twitter does currently.

You can be Superman – Use Twitter

That was the title of my first blog post this year talking of the immense powers of Twitter. Unfortunately I am also writing its obituary at the end of the same year. When I say Twitter will be finished I don’t mean the concept of Twitter will be finished, but the service and the company ‘Twitter’ will find it hard to survive once Facebook makes it’s most critical change to its site. A change that would make Facebook far more exciting and talked about than it already is.

The uniqueness of Twitter lies in the way its communication channel is structured, everything on Twitter is transparent and anyone can choose to follow or write to anyone without the mandatory friend requests or other such formalities. It’s an open world and being on Twitter is similar to participating in Big Brother/Boss, everyone can see what you are upto. It is the perfect medium to interact with strangers and celebrities and it is definitely far more exciting to hear the opinions of strangers than the people you know in real life. The entire crux of Twitter lies there, the uncertainty and serendipity of anything happening anytime, only the ones who use it actively know what I am talking about and would agree with me.

Now let’s see how Facebook compares with Twitter. Sadly none of the above things are possible. All communication here is primarily between friends whom we know in real life or in a group that we are part of. It has settings through which our information can be seen by anyone, but for someone to keep track of what we are doing on a regular basis is quite a tedious task unless they are connected to us as friends. In effect Facebook is a closed community with focus on privacy and anyone unknown to us is seen with suspicion.

So if everything is so perfect and exciting with Twitter and if Facebook is nothing but a not so exciting extension of our real life where is the clash between the two?

Before I go on to talk of how Facebook is going to change this equation forever, I shall speak of few more things about Twitter.

While Twitter might seem the perfect medium to interact with strangers it could also turn out to be a lonely place. A major shock that most people encounter is the amount of followers one can gain on their own merit. The connection process is one way and it is not necessary that the person you follow has to follow you back. Even your own friends would not choose to follow you unless you are speaking sense there.  And people who follow you today might suddenly decide to unfollow you the next day; also to get a single response for any of your tweets would seem like a huge task for most people, it is like a culture shock in an alien land, leaving no incentive or reason to continue out there. And there isn’t much else that one can do on Twitter. Precisely for this reason Twitter has the lowest levels of retention amongst its users, with most people leaving the service shortly after joining or remaining silent spectators while a very tiny percentage of people actually contribute to the bulk of the conversations. Not a good thing for any service to function this way.

So how will Facebook change it all and deliver the killer blow to Twitter?

It is clear that the one thing Facebook lacks is the ability to easily connect and converse with strangers and with total transparency. Going by my observation of Mark Zuckerberg’s personality, I can safely assume that the current form of Facebook is not what he intends it to be eventually. Facebook is in the process of evolution and we are somewhere in the middle of this process. The above two basic functions of conversing with strangers and transparency are a critical aspect for it to reach where it eventually will. Now let’s see how he will achieve it.

There are some basic tools of Facebook that drive all interactions. Few important ones are the status message window, share buttons and most importantly the LIKE button. LIKE is a feature that is gaining popularity more than any other tool and Facebook has made this button available to every website on the internet. Any piece of content today is LIKE’able, be it a video, article, photograph, message, website, etc. Facebook also has the feature of creating Fan pages for brands, celebrities, etc and one can connect with these sites by clicking the LIKE button. There are no boundaries or restrictions to LIKE any content anywhere. While the LIKE button is ominous all over the web there is one critical element that still does not have the ability to be LIKABLE.

The 500 million users of Facebook don’t have a LIKE button on them yet.

I read somewhere that with Facebook it is not a relation between a consumer and a product, the consumer is the product in Facebook. Imagine what would happen if one fine day Facebook decides to make all of its users LIKABLE, i.e. along with the option ‘add as a friend’ if there is a button that simply says LIKE, similar to the ‘follow’ button in Twitter, the entire dynamics of Facebook would change overnight. You would no longer have to send a friend request to a stranger and fear that it might be impolite or rejected, instead just go and LIKE the people you want to, and follow all their status updates which they choose to make public.

What about PRIVACY?

It seems ironic to see all the fuss about privacy when we actually crave for transparency and hail something like the WikiLeaks as a triumph of journalism or whatever and want the world to live that way. So my views on this matter are pretty straight forward and it is a great opportunity for Facebook to clean up its act and tackle the whole privacy bit with a new approach.

Sometimes when one takes two steps forward it is best to take one step backwards only to make a bigger leap ahead.

The current privacy settings of Facebook are a little tricky and data that is meant to be totally private is sometimes displayed to strangers, especially photo albums in which one is tagged. The motivation or intention for leaving this little room for ambiguity seems to be the ability to create the excitement of peeping into what strangers are doing. With the introduction of the LIKE button on profiles, Facebook can clearly define only two types of relationships in its world, Friends and Likers. Friends are similar to our family inside the four walls of our house and what happens there remains only there, whereas the Likers are similar to people we deal with outside our house and this interaction is visible to everyone. By stripping the other complex equations of ‘friends of friends’ etc, etc, Facebook can create a simpler system consisting of only these two relations, one private and one public. The moment this is done, Facebook will be on fire and will hurtle towards its next goal with effortless ease and with lesser headaches to take care of.

Will Twitter users migrate to Facebook so easily?

It is said; in business it is important to be the first to develop something to make it a success. While there is some truth to it, it is not true in entirety. Think about it, what was the first commercially successful email application? It was HOTMAIL. Does anyone use it today? I doubt many would say yes. Gmail is the more preferred one purely because of the better service it offers. Same is the case with a lot of other technology companies, it isn’t enough to be first, what matters is the ability to innovate and provide better service and Twitter seems to be very slow in rolling out new features which will eventually lead to migration to a better service offering the same with additional perks.

Surprisingly the perks here are not technology driven but more driven by human need to seek out and be accepted.

What about all the celebrities on Twitter? Will they ever use Facebook? You would be surprised if I told you that the amount of following that already happens with celebs on Facebook is far superior to that on Twitter. Try this for a sample, the Oscar award winning music composer AR Rahman has 2.4 Million fans on Facebook compared to .29 Million on Twitter, Barack Obama has 17 Million fans on Facebook compared to 6 Million on Twitter, Lady Gaga has 24 Million Facebook fans vs 7 Million Twitter followers, name the celebrity and their fan pages on Facebook already have far more fans than they have on Twitter. It is clearly a matter of time before they realize the huge numbers of engaged audience they have on Facebook compared to the mostly inactive followers on Twitter.

Twitter might soon become another Orkut.

Purists of Twitter which includes me too will have a 100 other questions and would debate about the advantages of Twitter and why Facebook won’t be able to replicate the same, especially things like the Re Tweet button, trending topics, search, etc. My answer to them is, sitting at my home typing away at my computer I myself have a 100 different approaches and answers to every query I can imagine, think what the level of understanding and knowledge the people sitting at the Facebook office might be having about every minute aspect. My suspicion is they already have a solution and I wonder what they are still waiting for. Incase they didn’t think of it already my services are readily available once I get my million dollar cheques from Mr. Mark Zuckerberg :)

What next?

What I have spoken about in this post is only a tip of the iceberg. Looking at the length of this post I can conclude that I could easily write a book about every minute aspect of Facebook and how it will influence our lives in future in greater ways than we can ever imagine. However the most exciting part according to me will be my next post, the one which talks of why GOOGLE has to be really scared of Facebook and how the entire face of internet will change once Facebook implements its next set of major updates. Facebook has already given a clue this week, rather a glimpse into the future by changing the way our profiles get displayed now on Facebook; get ready for some earth shattering changes soon.

Everything else on the internet will become irrelevant in the face of the Facebook juggernaut.


Till then,
Cheers!!!
Kartik Dayanand Boddapati

Look forward to seeing your comments in the comments section below, you could also connect with me on Facebook and Twitter.


Spread the word:


Comments

  1. Hmm, interesting analysis. Is this "Like" idea yours or are they, the people at Facebook seriously thinking of it? Sounds awesome!!

    Facebook is the leading Social Networking site today & Twitter is the lead Microblogging site today. It will be interesting if the two giants lock their horns some time soon. Awesome works Kartik & incase you need Mr Zuckerberg, let me know, I'll ring him up for you ;) !

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't subscribe to the fact that Facebook is the face of new Internet revolution, i do accept that twitter has some bottles necks and road blocks which it needs to be addressed, and the rate at which the new features are introduced is big disappointment but the real time nature of twitter in the face of adversities and the role played by the twitter especially during the radia gate controversy, forcing barkha dutt to make a special show and building up pressure by trending topics are never seen before or since. in fact, twitter was so overwhelming that this new phenomenon of twitter was reported by many foreign newspapers. i want you to watch this TED video where the power of twitter where real time updates were coming faster than CNN or BBC.
    http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/clay_shirky_how_cellphones_twitter_facebook_can_make_history.html

    secondly, i would like to mention that the kind of interaction and birds-eye of view of many personalities that i get everyday is overwhelming, i'm virtually being able interact with my favorite authors, jurons, make witty-remarks, read their articles instantly, post my response etc. the crowd frenzy that i've seen especially during the 2G scam and many national events following that was remarkable. i believe, the future is in twitter style model.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lets take a look at what works for twitter
    Twitter is open, it lets you follow celebrities (even if the interaction is one way most of the times), it provides a simple way to interact with other people, allows easy sharing on stuff like links etc.
    But even facebook has all this except the openness. Still both coexist peacefully. How?
    FB is associated with privacy while twitter is public domain. This is not necessarily bad for FB. This possible lock down of profile is what encouraged people to share info without inhibition eg people easily share photos with their friends but this aint exactly possible on twitter. You won't share family pics with the whole wide world. Share with friends? Yes why not.
    Friends and likers- two and only relationships does make sense. But do note that people will either choose to share updates publicly (ie with likers) or only friends. Most users wont juggle between the two settings from update to update. Hence those family pics won't go up if the default setting is public. If more people choose public, you will get twitter version of FB ie similar qualities, not exactly what FB would want.

    You seem to have assumed that the stranger to stranger interaction will be better on FB. That is not necessary. You are right that the 'perks are driven by human need to seek out and be accepted.' But how is FB going to provide better perks than twitter? If FB adds the like button to profile with the effect being that you get the public updates of the person you like, the interaction quality IS going to remain same. So FB is not going to go one up simply by adding the like button to profiles. What will work in FB's favour is the integration of services if it adds twitter like feature. This won't *kill* twitter, it might slow down the new user sign up rate though. The existing users of twitter wont migrate so easily. Some might but not the majority.

    Many people use FB AND twitter. For them, this creates a clear demarcation line between whats public and whats not. Blurring of lines on FB's side won't go down well with this user community. If FB forces this change, more people will end up using FB like twitter, not what FB would like.

    In a nutshell, what I'm saying is that by simple adding twitter like feature attached with something like public updates is not going to *kill* twitter. It will be a good addition in FB's arsenal though.

    Cheers.

    PS: By the way, FB is already introducing more 'open' features like this - http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/20/facebook-not-now-follow/
    I've been following this trend pretty closely.

    Also, you might like this for your next post on google http://techcrunch.com/tag/google-me/ googles effort to make its services more social.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear kartik,
    First of all I must confess that your post is brilliantly written(this doesn't mean I endorse all the views in the post) and I wonder if there is any other blogger who can put his/her theories/opinions so well as you.

    So let me now put my opinion on "how twitter will kill facebook"

    1)First of all Facebook is all about "social networking" which means sharing of ideas.But can ideas be shared so easily in facebook? no. I can't have conversations with anyone I like on facebook.I can't randomly see anyone's wall and comment on them.Most users have their account protected from non-friends and hence one must be a "friend" to comment or tag others.In twitter any one can tweet anything to any body.I can say things directly to the person concerned whether he/she follows me or vice versa.Such a free and two-way interaction is not possible on facebook.
    2)In twitter I can have simultaneous conversations with any number of people I want but that's not "exactly" possible in facebook.I cannot have a multiple chat facility where I can debate with any no of people.In facebook one can share pics/videos etc... and the same thing can be done on twitter (using other twitter related apps) too.So no facebook doesn't have any advantage here.
    3)Twitter proved to be a sensational tool for sharing news.Any news is broken first on twitter than most news channels!!!! Within seconds of any incident I get to know first hand accounts on titter.Twitter Media Watch has given sleepless nights to Indian Media.It's a well known fact that trends like #barkhagate and #mediamafia were the ONLY reason why journos were forced to look into themselves and do debates and write editorials.Thousands of tweets from right wingers and 24*7 trending of #barkhagate #mediamafia for more than 2 weeks made journos realize the impact of "twitter media watch" and public outrage against them.Also there are umpteen incidents where journos got a huge back lash on twitter for irresponsible tweeting and false reporting.This is the power of TWITTER.Such a mass movement urging people to come up with truth and unbiased info was unheard of in any other social networking site.
    4)Also facebook is trying to be over smart in introducing stupid changes every other day.Also there a lot of bugs which come up regularly which puts off even the most addicted user.My bro's account was deactivated and mine was hacked twice by my friends.I still have more than 300 friend and uesless page requests to be accepted.Too much spam is there on my profile.In twitter I get a maximum of 1 or 2 spam tweets in a day.On facebook I get about 20 or 30 requests which is irritating.
    5)Forgot to tell about those bloody notifications!!!! Every time I check the notifications,Facebook still reminds me to check those once again daily!!!
    6)lastly don't get me started to talk about Facebook's ridiculous mobile app.It SUCKS

    cheers!!!
    Chandan.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Brilliantly written kartik....way to go...sending u all the power write more :-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't know if you explored facebook completely.

    You can message anyone. you know/don't know doesn't matter.
    "In twitter I can have simultaneous conversations with any number of people I want but that's not "exactly" possible in facebook."

    its possible in a better and efficient way if u check out the message system and new facebook groups.

    About #stuff the same thing can be done in fb too. Fb search is much more powerful and informative. Just that people don't do it.

    Account being hacked has nothing to do with facebook..Its just in the hands of 'being hacked' person when it comes to such big sites.

    Notifications-- Don't want to comment. But I love that feature.

    To the author-- Nice post. But non-techie celebs prefer twitter.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nice one Kartik, you make a lot of valid points. I just have to say that while Facebook is social networking, Twitter is microblogging. But just like Facebook incorporates photo sharing, video sharing, messaging, etc it also incorporates blogging (its becoming an internet within the internet) and I would not be surprised if your prediction comes true and Twitter eventually bites the dust. Google on the other hand is much more diversified and will remain a tough contender I think. I was glad to read in the news the other day that Mark Z will be joining other US billionaire philanthropists in donating a large portion of his wealth.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Karthik, the post makes for a very interesting read. Thru the lens of Twitter n FB, it's really intriguing to see d kind of influence social networks can have over individuals n brands. To add to what you've mentioned: Firstly, the number of people registered with Twitter, are much less in compared to the number of people who are on FB. Secondly, as you said, barring a few, most users on twitter are passive and the main reason I think, is because on twitter a person feels "judged" by people. While on FB, he is free to update his status without having to think too much.. and it comes to his ego wen either his tweets aren't retweeted or followers dont increase. Also, if FB can imbibe certain key features from twitter, As you said, It sure would rule web space!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks Jaikish for replying :-)

    I explored Facebook quite well and I am disappointed with it.

    Also what can I do when someone hacks into my account? My password too is very strong.What about my bro's account which was deactivated by Facebook for no reason? Sent umpteen requests to reconsider their decision.Facebook refused to do so.

    Also I seriously disagree with you when you said FB is far more informative than Twitter.No.Twitter has been an excellent learning tool in my life.I sit 1 hr using FB.I get nothing.But the same time spent on Twitter is quite benefiting.

    Notifications-I have a serious problem with them when the same remainder comes each time I login in.As I write this comment, I am also checking the same notifications which I read a no of times over the past 3 days.

    All this is purely my personal opinion.You are very much free to disagree with me.

    PS:-For got to add.The only reason I login to FB regularly is because of "Mafia Wars".I am totally addicted to it!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. There are some basic tools of Facebook that drive all interactions. Few important ones are the status message window, share buttons and most importantly the LIKE button. LIKE is a feature that is gaining popularity more than any other tool and Facebook has made this button available to every website on the internet. Any piece of content today is LIKE’able, be it a video, article, photograph, message, website, etc. Facebook also has the feature of creating Fan pages for brands, celebrities, etc and one can connect with these sites by clicking the LIKE button. There are no boundaries or restrictions to LIKE any content anywhere. While the LIKE button is ominous all over the web there is one critical element that still does not have the ability to be LIKABLE

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't subscribe to the fact that Facebook is the face of new Internet revolution, i do accept that twitter has some bottles necks and road blocks which it needs to be addressed, and the rate at which the new features are introduced is big disappointment but the real time nature of twitter in the face of adversities and the role played by the twitter especially during the radia gate controversy, forcing barkha dutt to make a special show and building up pressure by trending topics are never seen before or since. in fact, twitter was so overwhelming that this new phenomenon of twitter was reported by many foreign newspapers. i want you to watch this TED video where the power of twitter where real time updates were coming faster than CNN

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please let me know what you think of this post

Trending posts this week

The Age of Bhakti: A Prescription for Disaster!

Happy New Year: Making Sense of Nonsense!

3 Idiots: Confusing a Nation!

Why BJP will never accept that CAA NRC protests are real

Maggi and the Tyranny of Truth!

Secret ingredient for great movies - Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo and more!

The Imposter: Why I don’t like Narendra Modi!

Meet the enemy of the internet!